One of the most popular application security methods to prevent application hacking is code Obfuscation. The majority of the time, this strategy serves as the first line of defence against hacking efforts and protects against common attacks like code injection, reverse engineering, and tampering with user and customer personal information.

Code Obfuscation

The application’s interface for end users or the code’s intended outcome is unaffected by code obfuscation. 

Why is Code Obfuscation Required?

Open-source software, which has a serious vulnerability to code hacking for private gain, benefits greatly from code obfuscation. Developers protect the intellectual property of their products against security risks, unauthorised access, and the discovery of application flaws by making it difficult to reverse engineer an application. When code is obfuscated, the time, cost, and resource considerations tip the scale in favour of terminating the project because the decompiled code is useless. create qr code online

Types of Code Obfuscation Techniques

Obfuscation operates on a number of levels; it can be used to obfuscate either semantic structure or lexical code structure or data structure or control flow. Depending on the action they carry out on the code, obfuscation methods also differ. In essence, the security team chooses the type of obfuscation to use on the code after consulting with the development team. 

Rename Obfuscation

This method entails giving variables perplexing names in order to cleverly conceal the true purpose for using them. This obfuscation method is typically used to obscure Java,.NET and Android platform application code. This is an example of layout obfuscation, which targets the source.

Data Obfuscation

This hacking method focuses on the data structures that are employed in the code, making it impossible for the hacker to access the program’s actual purpose. This could entail changing how data is processed for storage in memory by the programme and how it is displayed as the output. There are various variations of this method. 

Debug Obfuscation

Debug information is frequently helpful in determining important details regarding programme flow and defects through decompiling and recompiling source code. By altering their line numbers, and identifiers, or by completely preventing access to debug information, such identifiable information must be concealed.

Address Obfuscation

The address obfuscation mechanism makes the process of reverse engineering challenging since the virtual addresses of the modified code and programme data are changed randomly with each execution. Because of this, the majority of memory-error exploits have non-deterministic effects and have a very slim chance of being successful.

Custom Encoding

With this approach, programmers encrypt texts with a special algorithm and offer a decoder function to recover the original code.

Passing Arguments at Runtime

It is possible to modify the programme to anticipate parameters during runtime. In order to decode the variables, the user must possess both the decryption key and the code. In order to establish a layered defence strategy for safeguarding applications against various security risks, the security team may also decide to deploy multiple techniques simultaneously.

Determining Quality of Obfuscation Method

Several factors that affect the quality of code transformation determine the effectiveness of code obfuscation. The following aspects should be considered in combination to assess an obfuscation technique’s quality:

Differentiation and Potenence: This demonstrates how different the obfuscated code is from the original code. In order to make the source code more complex, nesting levels, inheritance levels, and the depth of control flows are all used. This level of complexity is raised by the code obfuscation.

  • Stealth: To deceive the attacker about the obfuscated section, the obfuscated code must be impossible to tell apart from the original source code. As a result, the attacker finds it challenging to perform reverse engineering. This variable depends on the situation and is frequently important for avoiding automated reverse engineering attempts.
  • Cost: It is defined as the difference in execution time and resource requirements between obfuscated and non-obfuscated code. When implementing an obfuscated system, several performance factors must be taken into account. An intentionally obfuscated piece of code should confuse the attacker using reasonable methods without needlessly burning up resources.

Does Obfuscation Impact Code Performance?

By altering code structure and performance, code obfuscation can have a severe negative effect on application performance. Performance is generally unaffected by renaming obfuscation, although it may be by control-flow obfuscation. Depending on the methodologies and contextualization, the effect on code performance ranges from 10% to 80%. As any type has an opportunity cost, potency and resilience should be the guiding concepts in code obfuscation.

The majority of the obfuscation methods described above do prioritise code performance, thus it is up to the development and security experts to select methods that are most appropriate for their applications. Multiple input libraries are combined into fewer output libraries using strategies like binary linking. Although this might lead to lighter applications and give hackers less access to your app code, decompiling at runtime for code execution is a pain and frequently lengthens code execution time. These trade-offs must be made in advance so that a security roadmap can take them into account and provide the proper level of security before running code in a live environment. In other words, the higher the obfuscation’s effectiveness and complexity. 

Benefits of Code Obfuscation

To stop attackers from looking over and analysing the code of open-source apps, security teams obfuscate the code. Applications handling user personal information require this layer of security. Obfuscators speed up compilation and improve efficiency by deleting extraneous metadata, dead codes, and duplicate codes from code.

Applications that use code obfuscation are difficult to reverse-engineer, making them appropriate for open-source platforms. Multiple layers of security frequently use iterative code obfuscation to deceive attackers about the purpose and visibility of the programme. It is a useful technique for dealing with threats and eliminating fun attackers, but it takes a lot of effort, talent, resources, and time to break. The majority of businesses obfuscate code for security and proprietary reasons, despite the fact that efficacy is challenging to quantify.

The Downside of Code Obfuscation

The majority of automated deobfuscators can decipher an application that has been encrypted. Obfuscation merely serves to slow down reverse engineering; it does not completely prevent it. Since obfuscation can also be used to conceal harmful code, some anti-virus software may also warn consumers when they visit a site using it. Users may stop using legitimate programmes as a result, and they may stop doing business with reputable companies. 

Should you Obfuscate your Code?

When weighing the benefits and drawbacks of code obfuscation, the decision of whether or not to use it is relevant. Yes, to answer briefly. At the absolute least, code obfuscation makes a programme into a complex piece of code while retaining all of its functionality. Obfuscating your code is a good idea for several reasons, including the difficulties it presents for reverse engineering and cyber criminals. powerful enough justifications for adopting a strategic code obfuscation include a powerful binary-level obfuscation and benefits to programme performance from code minimization.

Code obfuscation should be used in conjunction with other security measures, such as code substitution, code tamper detection, runtime application self-protection (RASP), watermarking, encryption, server-side safeguards, etc., for optimal results. As a result, it is challenging for attackers to finish their tasks on schedule. A few obfuscation tools are available that examine the behaviour of the application during runtime to detect performance-sensitive code and to highlight those sections of code that could have an influence on performance if powerful obfuscation techniques are used.

Tools for Code Obfuscation

Several utilities, like ProGuard and DexGuard, are available for Android Studio. One open-source Java obfuscator is ProGuard, a class file shrinker that eliminates unneeded classes. The remaining classes with useless names can be renamed with its assistance. Reverse engineering the resulting JAR files is challenging.

These are: 

  • Obfuscating Python
  • Obfuscating JavaScript
  • Obfuscating PHP
  • Obfuscating HTML
  • Obfuscating C, C#, and C++


All things considered, code obfuscation alone is insufficient to combat sophisticated security threats. Although deobfuscating code is challenging, it is nevertheless possible to reverse-engineer thanks to automated tools and skilled hackers.

As a result, Code Obfuscation cannot satisfy all requirements for application security. The development team could take into consideration adopting a variety of code obfuscation techniques in order to safeguard their code in an untrusted environment, depending on the security requirement, nature of the application, and performance benchmark. These should be carried out while considering the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Other AppSec measures like encryption, RASP, data retention regulations, etc. should complement this strategy. It acts as a potent defence mechanism against RASP technologies like AppSealing when used in conjunction with them.


Leave a Reply